Cooling?Introduction

What About Pole Ice?

Arctic and Antarctic Pole Ice Cover is Roughly the Same

What is the actual state of ice cover at the poles? The following charts are from the National Snow and Ice Data Center of the US government’s site, here. The chart shows slight declines as well as slight increases over the median ice edge from 1981-2010—basically the same for the last 40 years! This means there is no substantial “global warming” on the North or South Poles. This is current data from US satellites.

The plots can be altered and coloured with bright red, for example, on a subjective basis, as they have been for various plots derived from the underlying data, but there is little objective, scientific basis for such alarmist excesses. 

Ask yourself, does it appear that the poles are melting alarmingly? Below is for the Antarctic region.

 

Again, some increasing, some decreasing, from the median edge of 1981-2010 during the month of February. This does not appear as cause for an emergency alarm. Where is the effect of supposed “global warming”? If the “greenhouse gas” theory is not confirmed by the evidence, perhaps that is suggesting the theory is not valid.

3rd-party Audit Recommended

Furthermore, concentration anomalies from the beginning of the data in 1981 (plot below, for example) show that the ice edges are generally of low concentration, with ice breaking off through the year, and never very clear ice boundaries on a continuous basis. Because of previously discovered and demonstrated bias, visual verification of the data behind these plots, confirming that it has not been tampered with, by way of a 3rd-party audit, would have to occur before they can be considered accurate scientific record, independent of their origin.

Please enter your email so that we can update you when the new book is out, and to download the free paper:

Note the outstanding peer reviews below, presented anonymously, which you are also encouraged to do to info@climatesciencejournal.com in the present politically-charged “climate” of climate science.

"You have found a promising approach to demonstrate successfully that the long suspected culprits of global warming, e.g. CO2, CH4, are actually not !"

PhD, Physics
Rutgers University, New Jersey
B.A. Cornell University, New York

"…seems to be path-breaking research in the domain. The paper reads nice and the science involved is analogous and clear. This paper is a hallmark and would benefit the advances in science, government planning as well as policy makers for the next course of action. I congratulate you for this great work and thank for giving me an opportunity to read it and enlighten myself."

PhD, Atmospheric Sci and Meteorology, IISc
M.Sc., Geophysics, ISC
BSc., (Hons) Physics, Delhi U

"An alarmist bias in Global Warming Research has corrupted the academic/scientific community"

Dr. Roy W. Spencer
Ph.D. Meteorology
University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Principal Research Scientist at UoA
Former Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center

"I have studied your paper during the weekend and I am impressed by your brilliant analysis and convincing argumentation. This looks like a very original thought process and one that does deserve broad dissemination."

B.Sc. (Hons) Mech. Eng.
DTU, Denmark
C.P. Eng. (Chartered Prof. Eng.)
Former Project Manager, CERN
Geneva, Switzerland

previous arrow
next arrow
Slider

You will only receive quality content.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *